=PoisonedPure

Oh jeez, the things you see on deviantART. I've found today photos of clitoris', hard-ons and stimulated penis' on deviantART that have been viewed THOUSANDS of times and yet they are still on here.

I am horrified and disgusted.

I am not a prude, but hell. I don't want to see a grainy macro of your clitoris. That's not art. If I wanted a biology lesson f*ck me, I'd get a mirror and check myself out. Better yet, I'd go to a medical site to see anatomy.

What is worst is that when I tried to report these things as policy violations I couldn't. Good one DA. Have a policy violation report button and you can't even bloody use it because it always comes up with an error.

Nah, serious guys. This is getting beyond the joke. There is no such thing as "Art Porn". Porn is porn, art is art. A woman naked is not porn, a woman spreading her vagina or fingering herself or playing with a penis is not art. The definition of pornographic is something viewed as grossly obsene literacy or art or imagery of sexual gratification, especially that produced for money. Look it up in the dictionary. *throws one at your head*

I've seen a lot of penis' and vaginas' on this place. They all look the same. Really, they do. Different shapes and sizes yes, but basically the same. I have never found a vagina photo or a penis in a shot that has had me hot and flustered. Sorry, it just hasn't happened. So why the hell is there so many comments on these things like "Oh, I have a hard on right now". "I'd like to meet that pussy in person" "SLUUUUURRRP!" etc etc allowed.

Nah. :shakeshead:

Just..don't get me started.

I'd be bloody worried if a gynachologist behaved in such matter, or worst still a photographer of a ARTISTIC NUDE (yes, there is such a thing) model got aroused during the photoshoot.

Look, there is this thing called Artistic Nude. There is also things called Fetish Art and Eroticism. Look them up and check them out. You can do them tastefully and well. A good example is Helmut Newton, Dita Von Teese, David Lynch & Christian Louboutin (anyone with a shoe fetish will know about that exhibition and series of photos) . These were just names off the top of my head.

Don't get me started on the Hentai and tenticle porn on here. Hmm, slash literature anyone?

Edit:

~allbecauseiloveyou

This is what I am against, so the notes that I have received in relations to the fact that I should get off my soapbox and let them take nudie photos for the sake of nudie photos because it is the common theme and "cool" and grainy macros of pubes, penis and vagina is where they have to start is rubbish. No, I am not going to sit back and say nothing about it because who are we to judge what is art and what is not. No, I am not a prude and all the other names I have been called. No, I don't think we should change the point of view of the terminology of pornography because it is just a natural act. :shame:


Thanks to all that have taken the time to comment even if you agree and disagree. Thanks also to the few people that I have commented on their work and why they have chosen to show their work as such, and have indeed thanked me for my point of view and given me a rather good response to my questions. I don't agree with it, but I respect you for giving me your point of view. I've enjoyed reading everyone's responses and all that have posted on this journal and not flamed me in notes have done so with eloquence and good points.